outsourcing to India

Bridge Blog

A question that I often hear is whether offshoring is better than nearshoring or vice versa. First, let’s get straight on the difference. Nearshoring is when you move work to a country that is nearby your own country. Wikipedia speaks about a country bordering yours, but in Europe, we often mean Eastern Europe. Offshoring is moving work to another country in general. More specifically, most people mean moving work to a country in Asia, farther away. Some people talk about farshoring, rightshoring, bestshoring, nearsourcing, etc, but I will use the definitions above.

As my company has offices in both Eastern Europe and India, people always ask me what the differences are. 

What most people perceive is that nearshoring is easier, because the time difference between Western and Eastern Europe is only 1 hour, you can travel there in 2-3 hours and the cultural similarities are bigger. Let’s look at each of those factors.

1. Time zones

There is only one hour time difference between Western and Eastern Europe. The difference between India and Germany is 3.5 hours in summer and 4.5 hours in winter. You have more overlap in working hours with nearshoring, which works better in most cases. In some cases, it might be good to have people in India finish certain work for you while you are still sleeping, to find it finished once you arrive at office. To make offshoring work out well, communication is crucial, so overlap means ‘more time to communicate’. At the same time, it’s easy to get a discipline of daily meetings on fixed times in which you discuss things that matter.

2. Travel

If you plan to travel frequently to your offshore destination, it might be preferable to choose Eastern Europe. You do not need visa for most countries and the flight typically takes 2 hours. Travelling to India takes more time. For sun seekers, it might be an argument to choose India to attach a small vacation to the trip?

3. Cultural differences

This is the most untouchable topic of all. People vary greatly in their perception of the cultural differences. For me personally: I have spent almost 2 years living in India and I work with people from India as easy as with people from Eastern Europe. For most people, the impression is that people closer are more ‘alike’. At the same time, when a Dutch does business with a German, there are already vast differences. One could also argue that communism had a big impact on the mindset of Eastern Europeans, which increases the differences between East and West. The key is to become aware of the differences, to spend time with the people so you understand the subtle differences. I had a short interview with Chris Smit a few weeks back, which might give some interesting clues.

4. Language

Almost all people in India that have done an education and work in the IT or BPO sector speak English, with an Indian accent. I can personally understand anybody from India and typically, it takes some days/weeks for somebody new to the Indian accent to understand it fully. For most Indians, English is their second language, so they know the language. For people in Eastern Europe, it’s not so common. Most have learned English at school and had little practice. Writing is often better than speaking.

5. Availability of people

This is one of the factors that should have a big impact on the decision on location. It’s crucial to get the right people and the bigger your choice, the higher the likelihood of attracting the best talent. India has about 200,000 IT graduates per year. In 2025, the Indian government plans to have 30% of its youth with a university degree (it is 12% today). In Eastern Europe, there are also large numbers of IT graduates, but the numbers per country are smaller than India. For certain work, it will be easier to find skilled people in Eastern Europe, for others in India. I always advice to make the choice dependent on the specific skills that you are looking for, while taking into consideration the skills and the number of people that you envision for the next 5-10 years.

6. Costs

Last but not least: costs. In India and Eastern Europe, 2 factors have a big influence on the salary levels: which city do I choose and what type of people do I need. The bigger cities are usually more expensive than the smaller ones. People in Bangalore ask higher salaries than people in Cochin. People in Kiev earn more than people in Odessa. The Eastern European countries that are part of the EU are more expensive than the ones outside the EU. The salary level for general people is lower in India than in Eastern Europe. If you are in search of a niche specialist, it might be the other way around.

I realize that I have not given an answer to the question this article addresses. This is because I believe there is no answer to it. It depends on the specific needs that you have. If there is one general thing that I would advice as a guiding principle: it’s about getting the right people. In which country, in which city, where am I most likely to get the right people at the right cost? If you get smart, talented, driven people, the rest is not important, because you will be able to organize around it.

Duorastat, December 22, 2011 - 09:27

When it comes to service or process outsourcing based on the requirements of your company, most expert business advisors would suggest that the best way of doing this is to set a bidding process for various BPO providers. Naturally, the request for proposal process for procurement outsourcing is an efficient approach when it comes to comparing the performance level of third party providers either via commercial agreements of contractual terms. But on the other hand, this particular approach is only viable for procurement outsourcing. When used on BPOs, there are possibilities that it might delay project delivery and or totally disconnect the solution from the initial strategic intention.

Although process outsourcing has its own advantage for the company such as providing healthy margins for outsourcing advisors, looking for a reliable process  outsourcing provider must be made a priority and ensure all angles are covered to protect the interests of the company. Process outsourcing has its own advantages and benefits. For starters, typical process for outsourcing allows third party BPO providers understand what it is you really need by knowing your service specifications. And by doing so, they will also find the best and most ideal solutions for your requirements. Another major advantage you can enjoy is that the process outsourcing will certainly ensure that all analysis and evaluation for BPO requirements are properly done. With this in mind, the company will able to come up with a correct proposal with regards to the products or services that need to be outsourced from third party providers.

Bidding for process outsourcing will also allow third party providers to know that there are other providers offering the same services out there vying for the same position so they have to really make the best effort in order for them to win the bidding process. In addition to that, BPO providers will be filtered accordingly and ensure that the company will be able to find an outsourcing provider willing to meet all process specifications. This will also ensure that third party BPO providers will be able to offer accurate responses in answer to the required specification of the client and by using a systemized approach, there will be no issues regarding nonalignment in the process.

Typically, a good and comprehensive selection process can result to the proper selection of process outsourcing providers based on their capabilities and performance levels when it comes to delivering results and solutions as requested by the clients. But sometimes this process can also provide some disadvantage for the company particularly for short term projects. The process itself will take time and it can create a huge delay on the part of the company looking for outsourcing providers.

Using the process outsourcing has its own advantages which can significantly improve the efficiency of the company’s operation. But on the other hand, it is all practical to understand the downside of this particular approach order to avoid the common mistakes which can lead to the breakdown of the company operation.

To learn more about outsourcing and get your free copy of my book, ‘Outsource This!’ visit http://www.123Employee.com.

About Author:Daven Michaels is an award-winning outsourcer and author of the book, ‘Outsource This!’ Daven has been honored more than any other individual or outsourcing organization. You can get more information on outsourcing by visiting http://www.123Employee.com

Vuossárga, December 19, 2011 - 11:16

Det holländska partiet PvdA (Arbetarpartiet) kommer att lämna in ett lagförslag som förbjuder kollektiv uppsägning på grund av offshoring. Det uppger partiet i sin blogg.

Jag tycker att detta sätt att tänka inte passar sig i vår tid och att det också finns felaktigheter som kan förbises. Vi lever i en tid av globalisering, vilket innebär att arbete görs på den plats där det kan genomföras bäst och/eller billigast. Jag tycker inte att regeringen bör lägga sig i detta.

För att kunna vara internationellt konkurrenskraftiga, bör holländska företag ges alla de möjligheter som finns för att locka kompetens och talang. Oavsett om denna kompetens finns i Holland eller på andra sidan jorden. Kompetens säkrar tillväxt och skapar värde som i slutändan leder till välfärd och mer statliga inkomster.

Som jag nämnde förut finns det två felaktigheter i partiets förslag. Vilka följer nedan:

1. Det sägs att “jobb kommer att gå förlorade och att arbetslösheten kommer att gå upp”. De flesta studierna visar att offshoring skapar jobb (i det långa loppet).Företag ökar sina vinster och de kan växa + lansera nya idéer. Det här leder i det långa loppen till fler jobb i Nederländerna (på högre nivåer) samtidigt som det skapar jobb utomlands. Jag undrar hur PVDA har kommit fram till att jobb kommer att gå förlorade.

2.PVDA antar att det ”generellt sett finns tillräckligt med personal på den inhemska arbetsmarknaden”. Likväl läser jag ofta om bristen på kvalificerad IT-personal i tidningarna. Jag prata också ofta med IT-företag i Nederländerna som upplever samma sak. Företag kan inte öka sin tillväxt om de inte kan fylla sina vakanser (snabbt). Genom att förbjuda uppsägningar på grund av offshoring, kommer många företag inte att kunna öka sin tillväxt.

En positiv utgångspunkt är att stimulera ansvaret för arbetsgivare att investera i alternativa arbetsuppgifter och utbildning. Jag tror inte att vi avsiktligt avser att säga upp folk i en större skala och ersätta dem med personal från Indien. Om folk sägs upp av multinationella bolag rapporteras detta ofta i detalj i pressen, men jag tycker att MKB ( den holländska organisationen för små och mellanstora företag) målar upp en annorlunda bild. MKB-företag använder huvudsakligen offshoring som ett komplement till deras nuvarande arbetsstyrka, inte för att ersätta den. Ett förbud likt det som föreslås är därför inte den rätta politiska reaktionen i min mening.              

 

Gaskavahkku, December 14, 2011 - 08:21